Universal Basic Income – Pros & Cons

universal basic income

Theme :-

  • Indian Government is likely to bring ‘Universal Basic Income scheme’.

Universal basic income (UBI) or basic income is a periodic cash payment that each citizen of a country or region is provided irrespective of his income, resources or the employment status of the individual. It is a measure undertaken to elevate poverty and decrease the income disparity prevailing in a country. Every Universal Basic Plan varies due to its amount or design. This provides a safety net by supplementing the wages from work. It is the most ambitious social policy and has gained immense popularity in 2017. There a pool of ambiguity around this scheme. Some people consider it to be a substitute for welfare, while others consider it useful only when provided with the existing schemes or even regard it as high as an alternative to wages from work.

After the fall of BJP in the assembly polls it is expected that the Modi Government might transfer certain amount in the bank accounts of the people who are unable to earn and introduce the concept of UBI in India.

Another important question surrounding the issue is the scenario of upcoming artificial intelligence and robotics. It is being argued that this will pose a threat to the availability of jobs. Thus there is a lot of debate about the advantage of a fixed income which will promote everyone above the poverty line.

 

Pros:

  • Increase in labor market efficiency:

A guaranteed income will help laborers to rise up the ladder or go back to school, colleges to gain knowledge and improve their skills. This will lead to reduction in the number of people who are stuck in jobs that are bad fit. This in turn will increase the labor market efficiency and improve job satisfaction.

  • Reduction in bureaucracy:

Currently many officials and bureaucrats obturate the benefits of existing welfare schemes. Thus the actual beneficiaries are unable to get the required aids. But with a single fixed amount, the complexity of the procedures will reduce and the entire benefits will be directly transferred to the individual.

  • Provides recognition to unpaid work:

There are various things which are essential for the working of the economy, but are not recognized as economic activities. For e.g. the work done by parents which goes unrecognized in a monetary way. Thus a basic income will ensure recognition to these activities.

  • Promotes Entrepreneurship and sales:

The extra income will provide a safety net in case a new business falls down. Thus this will promote new businesses to grow and also help in selling the products as now buyers will have more disposable income in hand.

  • Improves mental health of people:

A guaranteed income helps in improving the mental health of people by eradication stress caused on account of financial insecurity, poverty and scarcity.

  • Promotes women empowerment:

Women that are below the poverty line suffer more than men. Thus a guaranteed amount in their account will help them make their own standing and develop their say in the family matters.

Cons:

  • Radical increase in the government cost:

The cost of providing a basic income will be much more than the amount itself. Thus deciding an optimum level of UBI will pose a challenge. According to IMF estimates, India can provide a basic income of Rs.2600 annually to each person. Even such a meager amount will affect the fiscal costs heavily.

  • Increase in consumption of temptation goods:

There is a possibility of increase in consumption of alcohol and cigarettes as people will regard this income as extra and will not use it optimally.

  • Increase in labor cost:

In a country like India, a free income will reduce the voluntary labor availability drastically. This will increase the labor costs and hinder the advantage of India being a cheap labor country.

  • Decrease in the taxable income:

The UBI might deprive people of the motivation to work, this would generate lesser taxable income and hence reduction of the government revenue.

CASES FOR TRIAL OF UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME

  • UNICEF provided basic income in Madhya Pradesh:

Between 2011-2013, a UNICEF study lead by sociologist Sarath Davala and Guy Standing, provided an equivalent of $1 million to a pilot of 6000 people in the villages of Madhya Pradesh. It was observed that this money was utilized carefully by the people. This money was spent on child education or creating greater income opportunities through livestock.

  • Hawaii became the first U.S. state to implement UBI:

In June 2017 Hawaii passed a bill that gives every citizen of Hawaii a right to receive a basic income. Such a measure was taken up due the fear of labor loss arising from automation.

  • UBI trial in Iran:

In 2010, the government of Iran successfully implemented the UBI trial by transferring 29% of median household income. The results did not provide any evidence of poor forging their jobs, instead people invested in business.

CONCLUSION:

Even though Universal Basic Income is expected to take off the load from healthcare services and social institutions the cost of providing it is too high. Thus it can be concluded that Universal Basic Income is surely beneficial but there is a threat to its purposefulness on account of increase in costs.

Your Turn..

What is your opinion on this topic? Express your thoughts in the comment section below.

Photo Credits: Credit Score Blog by Mike Cohen via Flickr, under CC 2.0

Copyright @ Group Discussion Ideas.

Subscribe to GD Ideas

Please subscribe to our YouTube channel. You will get good content & we will get a subscriber. It’s a win-win for both of us. 😃

2 comments

  1. I think this is not Right time to implement it in India because India need to be learn more ,need to be develop and development comes through creative and innovative mindset of people ,UBI will make people lazy ,unwilling to work even in patriarchic society like India it will lead to increase in domestic violence to snatch money from women

  2. yes universal basic income concept sounds good.because it is a scheme not depend on the rich,poor,religion ,etc.all are treated equally .whatever the amount govt offers it is deposited to every persons account.there is no differences between the persons like some are getting the benefits and we don’t .and ubi offers less capacity of corruption than most anti poverty schemes because all individuals are getting the same amount of money.remove all the past schemes and implement these one scheme is better for the govt also. because there is no clumsy between rich or poor ..because previous schemes are for poor and below poverty line people.so it would take lots of time to the govt to decide the people who are bpl and estimated the amount it will take lots of time and also risky .in that process some people didn’t got their money.and because these technologies like robotics,artificial intelligence in future total system get automated and lots of people lose their jobs.so this scheme will help at that time.like every coin has 2 sides like every scheme has its good and bad.if govt provide basic income to the people some will utilise properly but some utilise it for bad things like drinking,smoking,betting etc.it will make people lazy.so if it is use in a good way it is good for society otherwise of course some bad will happen

Join in the Group Discussion...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *