Theme :-

  • There is a widespread demand from opposition parties to replace Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) system with paper ballot system to prevent EVM tampering.

What is Paper ballot system :-

  • In paper ballot system, voters mark their choice on the pre-made ballot papers and drop the voted ballot in the ballot box. After casting votes, ballot papers are counted and the number of votes will be declared.

What is EVM :-

  • Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) is used to cast and count votes using electronic systems. Using this method, voters have to press the button indicating their choice and the votes will be electronically registered.

In Favor :-

  • The main disadvantage of EVM is that it is prone to tampering. With paper ballot system, this can be prevented.
  • Paper ballots are more secure compared to EVMs.
  • Digitalization is on rise in every field. But not all sectors are same. For example, fraud in elections is not same as a fraud in e-commerce sector. If voting system is not secure, entire nation will be in the hands of the non-deserving leader.
  • Germany, Netherlands, Japan and some other developed countries reverted to paper ballot after trying EVMs.

Against :-

  • Reverting to Paper ballot system will be a contradictory step to encouraging cashless transactions.
  • Election Commission (EC) announced that EVMs will be replaced with advanced M3 machines in 2019 general elections. M3 machines stop working if they are tampered. So, there is no need to restore paper ballot system.
  • EVMs have a lot of advantages like faster results, cost-effective, accurate, portable, reducing the role of people, saving a lot of paper etc. So instead of going back to paper ballot system, it is much better to make EVMs tamper-proof.
  • In June 2017, Election commission threw an open challenge to tamper with EVMs. But no one could succeed in doing that.
  • Though many developed countries went back to paper ballot, for them it won’t take much effort because of their small population, and hence we cannot say that it is apt for all countries. Decisions should be taken based on all the factors involved. Brazil is also successfully using EVMs for elections.
  • Paper ballots are susceptible to violence and booth capturing. Hence going back to paper ballots will be a retrograde step.
  • In paper ballot method of voting, if the stamp is not put properly it will be counted as an invalid vote. With EVMs this problem will be eliminated.
  • When voter cast vote through EVM, he can get ‘Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail’ (VVPAT) which is a printout of his vote. This VVPAT came into effect with Supreme court order of 2013. And hence everyone can be sure of who got their vote.
Also Read :  Should Politics and Business be mixed?

Facts :-

  • India is using EVMs since 1999.
  • USA, and some other developed countries are still using paper ballot system.

Conclusion :-

Elections are the most important thing for any country. Trust of voters in the voting system is the most important thing than convenience or cost-effective solution. Either ‘secure digital voting system’ or ‘paper ballot system’ will ensure the confidence of voters and prevents the failure of nation.

[polldaddy poll=”9721520″]


Your Turn…

Do you think paper ballot system is better than EVM? Express your thoughts in the comment section below. And subscribe to our blog to read answers to trending GD topics.

photo credit: Sebastiaan ter Burg Voting form of the Dutch elections in 2017 via photopin (license)

Copyright @ Group Discussion Ideas.

Want to listen to this instead?

Subscribe to our YouTube channel. We upload videos on GD topics regularly.

Purpose: , ,


  • Sharad Shah, Jan 25, 2020 @ 9:00 pm Reply

    My objection to EVM is not on the ground of reliability but economic viability. The EVM cost is Rs.30,000.Their life is 15 years that is 3 elections. So the cost of EVM is Rs.10,000 per election.
    On the other hand, the cost is Rs. 1000 for the ballot box, Rs.1000 for ballots and Rs. 1000 for counting the allots. Total of Rs.3,000 per election. A saving of Rs. 7,000 per booth per election.
    I think that the Election Commission should refer this to the Office of Chief Adviser Cost for his opinion. In the meanwhile go slow.
    My own view is that EVM will never be viable unless the elections are phased to use the same EVM several times.

  • Tinku paul, May 2, 2018 @ 9:15 am Reply

    According to me EVM is good. At the time of counting it takes very less time as well as less manpower as a result costs has been reduced. In a democratic country everyone has right to cast their vote as per their choice to select their leader. Election commission has to take care as fraudster they will not be able to snatch their right and election commission has to take advance technology as fraudster cannot use this one and EVM can identify genuine one. if people they will not be able to cast their vote then there is no value of democracy. Election commission has to take strong action those involved in the bad activities they will be punished.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *