Theme:
- The phrase “Bullet for bullet” means returning harm with harm. If someone hurts us, should we hurt them back in the same way? Some people believe this is the only way to teach a lesson. Others feel that forgiveness and understanding are better. Let’s look at both sides of this idea.
Arguments in favor of “Bullet for Bullet”:
- If someone is trying to kill us and we have no other way to survive, we have the right to protect ourselves—even if it means hurting them. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution gives us the right to life, which includes the right to defend ourselves.
- If wrongdoers are not punished, they may feel bold and commit more crimes. Strict action can stop this. Moreover, a strong response can stop others from doing the same thing.
- Forgiveness doesn’t always work. Some people take advantage of kindness and repeat the same mistakes.
- When someone hurts us, seeing them face consequences helps us feel better.
Arguments against “Bullet for Bullet”:
- If we respond with harm, it often starts a cycle. The other person may also take revenge, and the problem keeps growing.
- Mahatma Gandhi said, “An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.”
- People who do bad things may be poor, young, or influenced by others. Instead of hurting them, we can help them understand what’s right and wrong.
- Forgiving someone can sometimes change their life. It also brings peace to the person who forgives.
- Talking works better sometimes. If there is a chance to talk and solve the issue, that should be tried first.
Conclusion:
Whether “bullet for bullet” is right or wrong depends on the situation. If someone is a danger to us or to society, a strong response may be needed. But if there is a chance to forgive, educate, or solve the problem peacefully, that is often a better choice. Life is too short to be filled with hate. Whenever possible, choose peace and move on.
Your Turn…
What’s your take on this topic? Express your point of view through the comment section below. And subscribe to our blog to read answers to the trending GD topics.
Photo By: Kaboompics.com
Copyright @ Group Discussion Ideas.
You can better than other persons if he hurt you ,you can get one chance to him further he again hurt you ,you can take action to him,like ‘Tit for Tat’.And my opinion is that if you can respect non violence ,you can forgive him.
I suppose Bullet for bullet is not a right policy…. Bcoz if a bad person wants to hurt u & if he/she does then forgive that person bcoz in this world there is nothing but forgiveness is something that people always remember ..& we can also teach them(bad person) how to not do the bad things Bcoz no one can do the bad things with themselves .behind every bad person there is a eerie story .& we not know that story… Also Gandhi Ji said that eye for an Eye makes world blind so there is nothing left with the blind world …
According to me bullet on bullet will always be a negative things to do or say , being a responsible person and a society man we have think twice and using brain I think we can resolve any hard situations in minutes.
According to me bullet for bullet it is not a right but self defence is very essential if someone wants to kill me that time I have to protect myself if I don’t have arm then I have to get die. Administration always not been with us. So self defence is very essential.
Bullet for Bullet is right policy. Yes, now pulvama terrorism affected many poor and good soldiers. But this topic depend Upon the
Situation . In India’s situation they must contect some battle to against Pakistan terrorism. That is correct to this situation, I thing that.
these views are actually too prestigeous………u know actually these points mean a lot to me..